Although GI decontamination has been considered a mainstay of treating poisoned patients, there is no evidence that GI decontamination procedures change outcome. Aggressive GI decontamination procedures are a product of this country-in
Syrup of Ipecac
Induction of emesis is no longer recommended. There is little data, but what data there is has revealed no benefit. The AAP also put their weight behind no longer using this product.
Gastric Lavage Once again, little data, but available data reveals little benefit. There is no role for gastric lavage in children less than 12 years old as the size of the tube is too small to retrieve pill fragments. There is no data in patients who are obtunded within an hour of ingestion.
SDAC adsorbs drugs due to its’ physiochemical properties. Adsorption of drugs onto charcoal was thought to decrease the amount of drug absorbed and thereby decrease the toxicity of the poisoning. Little data, but there is no data to prove its benefit. Although some drugs placed in solution in beakers are adsorbed onto AC, how that absorption translates to drugs in the stomach is unknown. Charcoal aspiration was previously thought to be innocuous, but there is now evidence that the charcoal remains in the lung tissue for years and can cause chronic pulmonary problems. The TN Poison Center seldom recommends SDAC, although it may be considered when cellular toxins (such as methotrexate or colchicine) are ingested. Administration of SDAC is still one of the more controversial areas of GI decontamination.
Single-Dose Activated Charcoal (SDAC)
Whole Bowel Irrigation
If a patient presents to the ED within 5 hours of ingestion, placing a tube into the stomach and administering 1-2 liters of golytely/hour through the tube may mechanically push pills through the GI tract. This is most frequently considered following ingestions of sustained release preparations, iron, lithium, other ions (such as arsenic) and for body packers. There is no data on efficacy.