Interactive work session at the Innovation Center
introduction | assignments
| synthesis reports | closing dialogue
closing
dialogue
click
on photos of the Radiant Wall to see a larger version of the same
image
Matt:
Lets focus on issues on similarities, barriers, drivers,
issues. What are we hearing? What about the similarities and key
drivers we captured in the scribing? Is there anything missing?
Key drivers:
Technology is improving.
Each
of the tiles had something about the need for more integration
and cadence of the small changes.
Culture
issues were in most of the teams.
The
feedback from economics is contrary.
Community,
is it a key driver or barrier? Key driver.
Patient-centered
is a key driver.
Metrics
are important for change. Need measurability for a foundation.
Barriers:
Leapfrog
has arbitrary regulations and is too prescriptive. It helps you
report if you have certain tools in place. It is hard to measure.
Outcome data can be very helpful, but there are drivers already
chosen. It is a heavy hammer. We need the stuff it does, but Leapfrog
may not the first thing we need to do.
Leapfrog
creates sound bites to draw attention to problem areas, so we
can work on items to change. How do we do sensible things in a
hot spot environment?
Matt:
Fuzzy logic allows for multiple statesyes,
no or some combination. It is not about compiling or non-compiling,
but it would give you some measures in-between. Might be a better
concept.
Outcomes
are not a satisfactory way to drive. They are largely un-actionable.
We
need structural process.
We
need to capture this in a breakthrough bucket.
We
need to engage the consumer.
Matt:
The person who wrote the book on Fuzzy
logic, said he wished he had never called it "fuzzy"
because it is very precise and consumers got another idea. Either/Or
logic does not give you good feedback loops.
Sound
bites are useful. We need tools to teach the patients value systems.
Matt:
It is a context sensitive system, so you
have to be careful to frame your request for feedback. It puts
a finger on a tremendous opportunity.
We
need meaningful models.
We
dont want to teach all our consumers, and then send them
to something like Leapfrog.
Matt:
How can we move to honest reporting? Honest
takes the hit. There is not a tolerance and tool for improvement
in place today. Creating the structure of process and communication
is critical.
Leapfrog
as a barrier measures three things that are not intended to be
the end of the trail, but the head. There have been no suggestions
for alternativestry to come up with the structure, process,
outcome you thing would be preferable.
Matt:
It shows the transformational
nature. Riding a bicycle downhill while building it. Everything
is in change at the same time.
We
have defined the issue nicely.
Leadership,
this is a different kind of leadership more organic.
Matt:
With tech systems, it seems there is more
of a top down structure, but the self-select creates a different
kind of leadership.
We
need to be anticipating the environment we will grow up in.
Matt:
Educators are creating a product that will emerge 20 years
into the future. Anything else?
Set
up for tomorrow.
In
Washington, there is an effort to re-education of the consumer.
There are som unrealistic expectations out there.
Matt:
If we put the consumer in systems terms,
we could see some of the problems we have there. It is probably
one of the most broken, disconnected pieces of the system with
multiple third parties in-between.
We
like to work late into the evenings, so you dont usually
get to go home until after dark, but since this is your first
time, we will go easy. We do however have some homework for you.
Take whatever context you want, but something that is you.
This is the process of shifting from focus to act. All of the
work today is about the systemsomebody else. The next work
is what you are going to do. What is the current trajectory and
what is the gap? Come in with that tomorrow.
Is
it the narrower focus or bigger issues?
It
is something you, personally, are in control or influence of.
It has to be actionable. It is relatively easy to thing abstract
thoughts, but saying who does what and when is harder. Think of
the ideal state is what you thing you could achieve in three years.
The current trajectory is what you think is going to happen and
the gap is what you see.
See
you in the morning.
<<<top
of page>>>
|